Collaborative Robots Versus Traditional Industrial Robots

As you research automation options, it’s hard to ignore the cobot buzz. Since collaborative robots entered the scene a decade ago, they’ve made automation accessible and affordable for many organizations for whom traditional robotics were out of reach. Collaborative robots were designed to be lightweight and easy to use.

Collaborative Robots Versus Traditional Industrial Robots
Collaborative Robots Versus Traditional Industrial Robots

The Truth Behind 6 Cobot Myths

1. Cobots are not industrial robots

Cobots were designed to be lightweight and easy to use, but today’s cobots are also powerful industrial tools that can be integrated with existing machinery and other robots through PLCs and sophisticated programming software.

2. Cobots are the only collaborative robots

Almost any robot can claim to be collaborative with the appropriate safety mechanisms in place (per the ISO/TS 15066 standard). But cobots are the only robots that were designed specifically to work alongside humans, and that also provide the versatility, user-friendliness, small footprint, and affordability that help define collaborative robotics.

3. Cobots are always safe to use next to human workers

Every automated application where humans are present requires a risk assessment—and that includes cobots. Based on the assessment, a collaborative application may still require safety mechanisms such as light curtains, safety mats, or reduced robot speed. But cobots are designed to be used within a collaborative workspace and have built-in safety mechanisms to support this use. A vast majority of Universal Robots cobots are used without safety cages.

4 Cobots result in people getting fired

With the U.S. unemployment rate remaining at 3.5 percent, the lowest in 50 years, 10,000 baby boomers retiring every day in the U.S. and few millennials interested in joining the manufacturing industry, cobots do not replace workers, they staff the repetitive tasks companies simply can’t fill. With cobots, manufacturers can reduce the number of human workers required for monotonous or injury-prone tasks and redeploy them into higher-value jobs. Often, the arrival of cobots significantly boosts manufacturers’ global competitiveness, enabling them to outbid competitors in low-wage countries, reshore work, and hire more people locally.

5. Cobots are slow

With extra safety devices installed, such as safety mats or light curtains, a cobot can work faster than a human and then either stop or reduce speed once a person enters the work envelope. Even in applications that handle tasks at the same speed as an employee would, cobots do so consistently without stopping or slowing down over time, which typically increases productivity and quality

6. Cobots are not ideal for precision handling
Cobots are suitable for very precise finishing, assembly, and electronics tasks. Universal Robots’ e-Series cobots now feature repeatability of 30 micron (0.03mm) in the UR3e and UR5e models and 50 micron (0.05mm) in the UR10e and UR16e. With built-in, tool-centric force/torque sensor the e-Series can handle applications where force-feedback is paramount in order to obtain uniform results and repeatability.

As you research automation options, it’s hard to ignore the cobot buzz. Since collaborative robots burst on the scene a decade ago, they’ve made automation accessible and affordable for many organizations for whom traditional robotics were out of reach. And that’s generated a lot of excitement.

But automating appropriately means evaluating your specific situation to make the best choice. The industry is changing rapidly and new robotic capabilities are blurring the lines between collaborative and industrial robots. At the same time, standards organizations are creating guidelines to keep workers safe as they interact with robots in a wide range of applications and environments.

This cheat sheet will help you go beyond the buzz to compare collaborative robots and traditional industrial robots, and dispel some commonly held misconceptions.

Collaborative and Traditional Industrial Robots Meet Different Needs

| If you need… | …consider a traditional industrial robot | …consider a collaborative robot (“cobot”) | | --- | --- | --- | | Ability to easily redeploy robot to different processes/tasks | | X | | Ability to program and set robot up in-house | | X | | Very high-volume in high-speed production (exceeding 1m/s) | X | | | Payload exceeding 16 kg (32 lbs) | X | | | Reach exceeding 1300mm (51.2 ins) | X | | | Minimal changes to existing production layout | | X | | Human workers to enter the robot cell to complete their tasks | | X | | Integration options with other machines and robots | X | X | | Low initial cost and payback in under a year | | X | | Ability to run processes with few or no employees | X | X | | Automation of processes or products that won’t change over time | X | X | | Very quick unboxing and setup | | X |

Ready to Get Started?

Once you’ve explored all your robotic options, see how easy it is to get started with cobots from Universal Robots, the company that pioneered the technology and continues to lead the market around the world. Download our ebook “Get Started with Cobots in 10 Easy Steps.”

Joe Campbell

Joe Campbell is a 40+ year veteran of the robotics and automation industry. After executive assignments in sales, marketing, operations and customer service with industry leading robot, system integrator and engineering companies, Joe recently retired as head of strategic marketing for Universal Robots North America. He is a regular speaker, lecturer and author on manufacturing labor issues, and the technology and economic benefits of robots and factory automation.

Local Office
  • Universal Robots USA, Inc
  • 27175 Haggerty Road, Suite 160
  • 48377 Novi, MI
Contact us: +1 844-462-6268
Contact us: + 1-844-GO-COBOT