Collaborative Robots: The New Option for Injection Molders

Thirty years ago, full servo-controlled robots of any kinematic configuration were rarely deployed in injection molding applications. The most common approach was to deploy a simple three-axis, point-to-point Cartesian robot that was machine mounted. By Joe Campbell, senior manager of applications development, Universal Robots.

Collaborative Robots: The New Option for Injection Molders
Collaborative Robots: The New Option for Injection Molders

By Joe Campbell, senior manager of applications development, Universal Robots

Thirty years ago, full servo-controlled robots of any kinematic configuration were rarely deployed in injection molding applications. The most common approach was to deploy a simple three-axis, point-to-point Cartesian robot that was machine mounted. With enough Z (vertical) stroke to reach the centerline of the platen, these very simple robots quickly extracted parts from the mold and delivered them to totes or conveyors.

Twenty years ago, full servo-controlled Cartesian robots became common, providing greater precision and control of the end-of-arm tools. Fifteen years ago, molders began applying six-axis robots in increasing numbers.

Watch cobots from Universal Robots tend injection molding machines at Dynamic Group in Minnesota, Alpha Corporation in Japan, and at Xiamen Runner in China

This evolution was driven by several technical and business drivers that continue today:

  • Post-mold processes. Customers are requiring molders to deliver more complete parts and assemblies, and molders are glad to increase their value. Degating, trimming, polishing, decorating, assembly, wrapping and packaging are now common tasks that are perfect candidates for automation.

  • Improved surface finish. Customers are setting very high standards for surface finishes, which require parts to be carefully handled from the mold to the final package or shipping container.

  • Shorter product life cycles. The pace of product updates and new introductions requires constant change in manufacturing processes.

  • High mix/low volume. Product customization, small lot sizes and on-demand production to reduce inventory are driving short runs, making setup even more demanding.

Cobots in Injection Molding application

In the last 10 years, and with increasing frequency of late, plastics processors have begun adopting a new level of automation, called collaborative robots, or “cobots.” Generally, based on articulated-arm technology, these cobots add a layer of safety, user-programmability, and mobility to standard six-axis robots. To understand the cobots’ attraction, it helps to start with a review of what makes articulated-arm robots popular in the first place.

The positioning flexibility and overall work envelope of six-axis robots are key to their success in injection molding. The additional degrees of freedom translates into more choices and options in all phases of the material handling, assembly, and other applications which translate into real process advantages:

  • Flexibility to execute pre- and post-mold processes. Placing inserts into the mold and moving parts through post-mold processes means complex motions and demanding angles and positions.

  • Reduced tooling costs. Four-axis Cartesian robots often require complex tooling to make up for their kinematic limitations. The range of motion and flexibility of six-axis articulated robots simplify tooling and gripper costs and complexity.

  • Flexibility to load precision inserts. Acquiring and inserting precision inserts is enabled by the positioning flexibility and repeatability of six-axis robots.

  • Complex part extraction simplified. Complex parts are difficult to remove without ejectors, but the dexterity of six-axis robots allows parts to be pulled gently out of the mold.

  • Flexibility to avoid obstacles. Tiebars, slides, hoses, and clamps often interfere with part motions. Six-axis robots provide the greatest flexibility to navigate around the mold.

  • Maintenance life. Six-axis robots are sealed, with reduced maintenance, and increased uptime. Most Cartesian robots in injection molding require regular maintenance, as their drive trains are exposed.

  • Flexible mounting options. Many six-axis robots can be mounted in various orientations to optimize layout, reach and cycle time. While the typical installation is floor or pedestal mounted at the back-side opening, other options are available for wall or ceiling mounting. For most six-axis robots, the mounting orientation is fixed and must be set at the factory during the robot build. Other models allow orientation to be set quickly in the field.

  • Low overhead clearance. Cartesian robots have a major drawback—the vertical (Z) axis extends above the robot centerline. Without a complicated and expensive telescoping Z-axis, ceiling height must be at least as high as the Z-axis extension. In many plants, conduit, wire trays, water, steam, and fire-suppression piping make this difficult, if not impossible. Mounting a six-axis robot over the injection machine can be accomplished even in very low-ceiling facilities.

  • Efficient use of floor space. Floorspace is always expensive, in any factory. And as molders add more and more pre- and post-mold processing to their offerings, the floor space around a machine is in even greater demand. Machine mounting a six-axis robot provides the six-axis flexibility benefits while freeing up floor space for secondary operations.

  • Easy machine access. Molds do have to be changed, and the maintenance department needs access as well. Mounting a six-axis robot on the machine or overhead also means clear access when required.

Alpha Corporation in Japan first considered deploying industrial robots to tend injection molding machines but abandoned the idea since the company did not have enough space to erect safety fencing.A UR5 from Universal Robots works in tandem with a Cartesian robot at Dynamic Group. Installing the UR cobots at Alpha Corporation in Japan improved productivity dramatically, resulting in a 20% increase in production output in the molding process of automobile keys.At 2K Trend in the Czech Republic, a UR10 cobot picks up inserts to be placed in the injection moldCobots can easily be moved from press to press, as seen here at Dynamic Group.


The use of cobots is exploding in the injection molding market. While cobots deliver all the six-axis benefits noted above, they also deliver significant advantages not available with traditional automation:

  • MORE floorspace. Collaborative robots were so named for their ability to work safely in close proximity to humans. When properly applied (after a risk assessment), cobots often do not require the heavy, expensive and space-intensive safety fencing and access doors associated with traditional automation. Their collaborative nature frees up even more floorspace, even for floor or pedestal-mounted installations, and allows for quick access to the cobot’s work area without opening safety gates, disabling alarms, etc. (Note, however, that while the robots themselves may be designed with sensors and speed and torque limitations to make them safe around humans, their end-of-arm tooling, or the parts they are handling, could present hazards without some mechanical or electro-optical guarding.)

  • Operators engaged. Cobots are designed to operate safely in close proximity to operators, other cobots and machinery. Maximizing the interaction between skilled operators and cobots can be more productive than using either robots or human operators alone.

Cobots can easily be moved from press to press, as seen here at Dynamic Group.

  • Portability. Lightweight and easy to set up and program, cobots are often treated as a manufacturing tool, moved from machine to machine as the production mix and schedule demand. Cobots have been successfully mounted on rolling bases or carts and wheeled into position for a short part run. Other installations have utilized magnetic bases, or a high-precision collet mounting to enable cobots to be moved machine to machine.

  • Easy to program – Some cobots offer extremely intuitive programming, making the setup, programming and interfacing to molding machines and other peripherals very straightforward. With no special software language to learn, even using lead-through teaching, operating costs are low, and even small and medium-sized operations can successfully implement robot automation.

  • Low cost/fast ROI. Cobots are changing how automation is implemented. Simplified programming and setup, pre-engineered peripherals like grippers and even vision systems, and reduced or no guarding, all add up to automation at about half the cost of traditional robots. Cobot systems are routinely being installed in the $75,000 range, which means incredibly fast ROI, typically within six to nine months.

Curious to find out more?Book a call with one of our automation experts today!

Joe Campbell

Joe Campbell is a 40+ year veteran of the robotics and automation industry. After executive assignments in sales, marketing, operations and customer service with industry leading robot, system integrator and engineering companies, Joe recently retired as head of strategic marketing for Universal Robots North America. He is a regular speaker, lecturer and author on manufacturing labor issues, and the technology and economic benefits of robots and factory automation.

Local Office
  • Universal Robots USA, Inc
  • 27175 Haggerty Road, Suite 160
  • 48377 Novi, MI
Contact us: +1 844-462-6268
Contact us: + 1-844-GO-COBOT